StockData

Buda Juice vs IP Strategy

BUDA and IPST side by side, both in beverages. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BUDA and IPST compare

Buda Juice is the larger company, worth 43 times as much as IP Strategy ($90.5M against $2.1M).

IP Strategy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (39.7% versus 11.8% for Buda Juice).

Buda Juice keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 28.0% compared with −2064% at IP Strategy.

IP Strategy scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Buda Juice), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBUDAIPST
Size and price
Market cap$90.5M$2.1M
Share price$7.20$2.10
Change, 1 year–−99.1%
Beta (5Y)–0.58
Employees3921
StockData Score
Total score89 (better)
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score3 (better)0
Health score44
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E36.0×–
P/S7.2×0.2× (better)
P/B4.2×0.1× (better)
EV/EBITDA19.6×–
P/FCF31.2×–
FCF yield3.2% (better)−801%
Fair value$5.63$36.27
Margin of safety−27.9%94.2% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)11.8%39.7% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−1.1%–
EPS growth (TTM)0.00%–
Profitability
Gross margin44.6%65.4% (better)
Operating margin27.4% (better)−2029%
Net margin28.0% (better)−2064%
FCF margin23.0% (better)−165%
Return on equity28.5% (better)−2713%
Return on invested capital113% (better)−2257%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.03 (better)0.00
Net debt / EBITDA−4.90–
Current ratio15.21 (better)0.31
Altman Z-score27.13 (better)−36.70
Piotroski F-score55
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield–0.00%
Years of dividend growth–0
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions3.1%6.5%
Held by insiders67.9%–
Short interest, % of float0.08%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.