StockData

Armlogi vs PAMT

BTOC and PAMT side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BTOC and PAMT compare

PAMT is the larger company, worth 3.8 times as much as Armlogi ($300M against $78.6M).

PAMT grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−2.1% versus −2.4% for Armlogi).

PAMT keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −7.3% compared with −11.2% at Armlogi.

Armlogi scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 5 for PAMT), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBTOCPAMT
Size and price
Market cap$78.6M$300M
Share price$1.73$14.32
Change, 1 year−81.3%38.1%
Change, 5 years–−57.7%
Beta (5Y)1.720.92
Employees1612,365
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)5
Valuation score23 (better)
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score00
Health score4 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.4× (better)0.5×
P/B9.8×1.5× (better)
FCF yield−8.9% (better)−21.5%
Fair value$4.60$18.25
Margin of safety62.4% (better)21.5%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−2.4%−2.1% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–4.2%
Profitability
Gross margin0.23%–
Operating margin−11.6%−8.8% (better)
Net margin−11.2%−7.3% (better)
FCF margin−3.8% (better)−10.6%
Return on equity−126%−20.6% (better)
Return on invested capital−157%−9.0% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.001.66 (better)
Interest coverage–−2.8×
Current ratio0.441.28 (better)
Altman Z-score0.891.53 (better)
Piotroski F-score33
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–0.07%
Shareholder yield0.00%0.07% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions–19.1%
Held by insiders59.2%78.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$0
Short interest, % of float0.04%1.6%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.