British American Tobacco p.l.c. vs Gold.com
BTI and GOLD side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BTI and GOLD compare
Gold.com grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (132% versus −0.99% for British American Tobacco p.l.c.).
British American Tobacco p.l.c. keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 30.3% compared with 0.32% at Gold.com.
Gold.com pays a dividend yielding 4.7%; British American Tobacco p.l.c. does not pay one.
Gold.com scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 6 for British American Tobacco p.l.c.), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BTI | GOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $1.1B |
| Share price | $61.52 | $38.03 |
| Change, 1 year | 18.9% | 40.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 77.9% | 5.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.23 | 1.13 |
| Employees | 17K | 1,355 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 12.6× |
| P/S | – | 0.0× |
| P/B | – | 1.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 2.9× |
| P/FCF | – | 0.9× |
| FCF yield | – | 109% |
| Fair value | – | $74.63 |
| Margin of safety | – | 49.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.99% | 132% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.13% | 27.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 153% | 375% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 157% | 325% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.6% (better) | −19.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 1.8% |
| Operating margin | 39.0% | – |
| Net margin | 30.3% (better) | 0.32% |
| FCF margin | 22.6% (better) | 4.7% |
| Return on equity | 16.9% (better) | 10.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 10.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.75 | 0.00 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.26 (better) | −2.81 |
| Interest coverage | 4.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.84 | 1.15 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 6.69 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 4.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 27.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 7 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | −12.6% |
| Shareholder yield | – | −7.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 14.2% | 59.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.20% | 32.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$21.4M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 17.9% |
Go deeper
- BTI stock overview
- BTI income statement
- BTI valuation and score
- GOLD stock overview
- GOLD income statement
- GOLD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.