Baytex Energy vs Helmerich & Payne
BTE and HP side by side, both in oil and gas field services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BTE and HP compare
Helmerich & Payne grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.6% versus −8.2% for Baytex Energy).
Helmerich & Payne pays a dividend yielding 2.7%; Baytex Energy does not pay one.
Helmerich & Payne scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 1 for Baytex Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BTE | HP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $3.7B |
| Share price | $4.26 | $36.62 |
| Change, 1 year | 64.5% | 36.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 41.1% | 48.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.63 | 1.10 |
| Employees | – | 6,200 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 0.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 6.6× |
| P/FCF | – | 11.6× |
| FCF yield | – | 8.6% |
| Fair value | – | $36.46 |
| Margin of safety | – | −0.44% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.2% | 16.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.8% | 16.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −369% (better) | −642% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 31.8% |
| Operating margin | – | 2.3% |
| Net margin | – | −3.4% |
| FCF margin | – | 7.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.98 |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.9× |
| Current ratio | 3.61 (better) | 1.96 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.99 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −33.5% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 2.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 51.6% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 3.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$11.5M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 6.8% |
Go deeper
- BTE stock overview
- BTE income statement
- BTE valuation and score
- HP stock overview
- HP income statement
- HP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.