StockData

Bitdeer Technologies vs Core Scientific

BTDR and CORZ side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BTDR and CORZ compare

Bitdeer Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (77.3% versus 77.2% for Core Scientific).

Bitdeer Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 4 for Core Scientific), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBTDRCORZ
Size and price
Market cap–$4.7B
Share price$5.60$14.52
Change, 1 year−59.8%−11.7%
Change, 5 years−45.8%–
Beta (5Y)1.46–
Employees471325
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)4
Valuation score00
Growth score22
Performance score12 (better)
Health score2 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–7.9×
FCF yield–−28.3%
Fair value–$4.93
Margin of safety–−194%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)77.3% (better)77.2%
Revenue growth, 5Y average27.2%39.5% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin9.8%41.2% (better)
Operating margin25.8% (better)−73.3%
Net margin–−18.3%
FCF margin–−223%
Return on invested capital11.1% (better)−39.0%
Financial health
Debt / equity1.10–
Net debt / EBITDA2.28–
Interest coverage42.3×–
Current ratio1.01 (better)0.67
Altman Z-score–−0.94
Piotroski F-score–4
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions66.1%136%
Held by insiders48.2%11.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months$447K (better)−$6.2M
Superinvestors holding33
Short interest, % of float49.0%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.