Bitdeer Technologies vs Canaan
BTDR and CAN side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BTDR and CAN compare
Canaan grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (96.7% versus 77.3% for Bitdeer Technologies).
Canaan scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for Bitdeer Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BTDR | CAN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $6.13 | $0.161 |
| Change, 1 year | −59.2% | −85.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −40.7% | −98.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.47 | 1.99 |
| Employees | 471 | 399 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 77.3% | 96.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 27.2% | 50.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 9.8% (better) | 7.8% |
| Operating margin | 25.8% (better) | −21.2% |
| Net margin | – | −39.7% |
| FCF margin | – | −55.8% |
| Return on equity | – | −59.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 11.1% (better) | −29.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.10 | 0.12 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.28 | – |
| Interest coverage | 42.3× (better) | −57.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.01 | 3.31 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 66.1% | 1.3% |
| Held by insiders | 48.2% | 7.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $447K | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 49.0% | – |
Go deeper
- BTDR stock overview
- BTDR income statement
- BTDR valuation and score
- CAN stock overview
- CAN income statement
- CAN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.