BTC Digital vs Zeta Network
BTCT and ZNB side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BTCT and ZNB compare
Zeta Network grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (225% versus 20.3% for BTC Digital).
BTC Digital keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −64.5% compared with −555% at Zeta Network.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BTCT | ZNB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.638 | $0.710 |
| Change, 1 year | −67.6% | −99.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.8% | −100% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.10 | 1.05 |
| Employees | 26 | 14 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.3% | 225% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −36.6% | 33.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | −22.5% | −18.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | −62.7% (better) | −66.0% |
| Net margin | −64.5% (better) | −555% |
| FCF margin | −98.1% | – |
| Return on equity | −23.5% (better) | −221% |
| Return on invested capital | −21.6% | −20.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.06 | 0.00 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −142.1× | −38.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | 7.79 | 9.67 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 14.5% | 4.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$104K |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.7% | – |
Go deeper
- BTCT stock overview
- BTCT income statement
- BTCT valuation and score
- ZNB stock overview
- ZNB income statement
- ZNB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.