BTC Digital vs Eason Technology
BTCT and DXF side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BTCT and DXF compare
BTC Digital grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.3% versus −28.2% for Eason Technology).
BTC Digital scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 1 for Eason Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BTCT | DXF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.638 | $0.261 |
| Change, 1 year | −67.6% | −90.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.8% | −100.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.10 | 3.22 |
| Employees | 26 | 15 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.3% (better) | −28.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −36.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | −22.5% | 58.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | −62.7% | – |
| Net margin | −64.5% | – |
| FCF margin | −98.1% | – |
| Return on equity | −23.5% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −21.6% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.06 | – |
| Interest coverage | −142.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 7.79 (better) | 3.33 |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 14.5% | 0.00% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 6.4% |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.7% | – |
Go deeper
- BTCT stock overview
- BTCT income statement
- BTCT valuation and score
- DXF stock overview
- DXF income statement
- DXF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.