StockData

BTCS vs TON Strategy

BTCS and TONX side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BTCS and TONX compare

TON Strategy is the larger company, worth 3.7 times as much as BTCS ($176M against $47.7M).

TON Strategy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (835% versus 34.5% for BTCS).

TON Strategy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −586% compared with −856% at BTCS.

TON Strategy scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 7 for BTCS), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBTCSTONX
Size and price
Market cap$47.7M$176M
Share price$0.909$3.20
Change, 1 year−69.5%−11.1%
Change, 5 years−87.5%−100.0%
Beta (5Y)1.331.29
Employees9–
StockData Score
Total score713 (better)
Valuation score33
Growth score33
Performance score01 (better)
Health score16 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S3.0× (better)3.9×
P/B0.5×0.5× (better)
FCF yield–−15.4%
Fair value$1.98$4.65
Margin of safety54.2% (better)31.1%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)34.5%835% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–5.1%
Net income growth (TTM)−348% (better)−449%
Profitability
Gross margin43.7%85.4% (better)
Operating margin–−55.9%
Net margin−856%−586% (better)
FCF margin–−59.9%
Return on equity−84.0%−52.6% (better)
Return on invested capital–−4.3%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Current ratio2.194.34 (better)
Altman Z-score−0.6714.20 (better)
Piotroski F-score34 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield0.00%–
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions15.6%61.5%
Held by insiders22.8%43.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$812K (better)−$7.0M
Short interest, % of float5.9%9.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.