StockData

Bit Digital vs 9F

BTBT and JFU side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BTBT and JFU compare

Bit Digital grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.6% versus 7.5% for 9F).

9F keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 125% compared with −346% at Bit Digital.

9F scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 5 for Bit Digital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBTBTJFU
Size and price
Share price$0.662$2.14
Change, 1 year−76.7%−53.7%
Change, 5 years−93.3%−91.7%
Beta (5Y)2.390.49
Employees104185
StockData Score
Total score58 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score03 (better)
Health score34 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)11.6% (better)7.5%
Revenue growth, 5Y average40.1% (better)−36.1%
Net income growth (TTM)−402%237% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)−423%238% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin–81.2%
Operating margin−296%8.4% (better)
Net margin−346%125% (better)
FCF margin−496%153% (better)
Return on equity−57.3%4.6% (better)
Return on invested capital−48.2%0.26% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.08 (better)0.00
Current ratio1.36–
Piotroski F-score17 (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions50.2%0.01%
Held by insiders18.8%53.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months$0–
Short interest, % of float20.4%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.