BT Brands vs Good Times Restaurants
BTBD and GTIM side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BTBD and GTIM compare
Good Times Restaurants is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as BT Brands ($13.4M against $9.4M).
Good Times Restaurants grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−5.8% versus −8.9% for BT Brands).
Good Times Restaurants keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.7% compared with −12.9% at BT Brands.
Good Times Restaurants scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for BT Brands), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BTBD | GTIM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.4M | $13.4M |
| Share price | $1.51 | $1.27 |
| Change, 1 year | −10.9% | −3.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −63.2% | −73.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.14 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 179 | 2,078 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 6.0× |
| P/S | 0.7× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 1.5× | 0.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 2.0× |
| P/FCF | 70.3× | 5.1× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.4% | 19.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $1.93 | $4.08 |
| Margin of safety | 21.4% | 68.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.9% | −5.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.6% (better) | 5.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 77.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 75.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −5.6% | 1.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −12.9% | 1.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.0% | 1.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | −23.6% | 6.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −13.0% | 5.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.31 | 0.01 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.59 |
| Interest coverage | −8.8× | 11.5× (better) |
| Current ratio | 4.74 (better) | 0.47 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.24 (better) | 1.58 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 8.6% | 11.5% |
| Held by insiders | 11.1% | 1.8% |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 0.14% |
Go deeper
- BTBD stock overview
- BTBD income statement
- BTBD valuation and score
- GTIM stock overview
- GTIM income statement
- GTIM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.