Black Stone Minerals, L.P. vs Dorchester Minerals, L.P.
BSM and DMLP side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BSM and DMLP compare
Black Stone Minerals, L.P. is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as Dorchester Minerals, L.P. ($3.2B against $1.4B).
Dorchester Minerals, L.P. grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (38.2% versus 5.1% for Black Stone Minerals, L.P.).
Both pay dividends: Black Stone Minerals, L.P. yields 6.5% and Dorchester Minerals, L.P. 11.9%.
Dorchester Minerals, L.P. scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 6 for Black Stone Minerals, L.P.), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BSM | DMLP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.2B | $1.4B |
| Share price | $14.06 | $28.46 |
| Change, 1 year | 3.0% | 24.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 24.3% | 59.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.32 | 0.41 |
| Employees | 122 | 26 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 13.2× |
| P/S | 7.0× | 6.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.6× | – |
| Fair value | $12.87 | $27.34 |
| Margin of safety | −9.3% | −4.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.1% | 38.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.5% | 26.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 87.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 85.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 64.3% | – |
| Net margin | – | 49.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 23.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.76 | 10.60 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 8.71 | 77.18 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.5% | 11.9% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 6.5% | 11.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 19.9% | 22.9% |
| Held by insiders | 14.7% | 4.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$36.3M | $2.1M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.7% | 1.0% |
Go deeper
- BSM stock overview
- BSM income statement
- BSM valuation and score
- DMLP stock overview
- DMLP income statement
- DMLP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.