Bassett Furniture Industries vs Virco Mfg
BSET and VIRC side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BSET and VIRC compare
Bassett Furniture Industries is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Virco Mfg ($189M against $101M).
Bassett Furniture Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.4% versus −19.0% for Virco Mfg).
Bassett Furniture Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.0% compared with −1.3% at Virco Mfg.
Both pay dividends: Bassett Furniture Industries yields 3.7% and Virco Mfg 1.6%.
Bassett Furniture Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 9 for Virco Mfg), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BSET | VIRC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $189M | $101M |
| Share price | $21.89 | $6.41 |
| Change, 1 year | 46.9% | −9.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 24.3% | 89.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.60 | 0.85 |
| Employees | 1,194 | 731 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.6× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 1.1× | 0.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.8× (better) | 77.3× |
| P/FCF | 23.4× | 11.4× (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.3% | 8.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $16.53 | $9.30 |
| Margin of safety | −32.4% | 31.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.4% (better) | −19.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.14% | 5.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −12.8% (better) | −118% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −117% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 56.6% (better) | 37.5% |
| Operating margin | 2.5% (better) | −2.5% |
| Net margin | 2.0% (better) | −1.3% |
| FCF margin | 2.4% | 4.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.1% (better) | −2.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 5.3% (better) | −3.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.03 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −4.42 |
| Interest coverage | – | −15.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.95 | 2.53 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.73 (better) | 2.10 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.7% (better) | 1.6% |
| Payout ratio | 102% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 11.7% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.56% (better) | 0.19% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.2% (better) | 1.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 55.6% | 33.9% |
| Held by insiders | 13.6% | 11.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $320K |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.48% | 1.6% |
Go deeper
- BSET stock overview
- BSET income statement
- BSET valuation and score
- VIRC stock overview
- VIRC income statement
- VIRC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.