Bassett Furniture Industries vs MasterBrand
BSET and MBC side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BSET and MBC compare
MasterBrand is the larger company, worth 7.0 times as much as Bassett Furniture Industries ($1.3B against $186M).
MasterBrand grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.9% versus 1.4% for Bassett Furniture Industries).
Bassett Furniture Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.0% compared with −4.0% at MasterBrand.
Bassett Furniture Industries pays a dividend yielding 4.6%; MasterBrand does not pay one.
Bassett Furniture Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 5 for MasterBrand), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BSET | MBC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $186M | $1.3B |
| Share price | $21.53 | $6.37 |
| Change, 1 year | 49.0% | −39.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 22.3% | −39.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.60 | 1.26 |
| Employees | 1,194 | 12K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.6× | 0.4× (better) |
| P/B | 1.1× | 0.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 23.0× | 13.5× (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.4% | 7.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $16.26 | $10.26 |
| Margin of safety | −32.4% | 37.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.4% | 12.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.14% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −12.8% (better) | −250% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −238% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 56.6% (better) | 25.2% |
| Operating margin | 2.5% (better) | −2.0% |
| Net margin | 2.0% (better) | −4.0% |
| FCF margin | 2.4% | 3.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.1% (better) | −7.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 5.3% (better) | −1.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.63 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | −0.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.95 (better) | 1.51 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.72 (better) | 1.50 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.6% | – |
| Payout ratio | 102% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 11.7% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.57% (better) | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.2% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 55.6% | 109% |
| Held by insiders | 13.6% | 2.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$157K |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.48% | 11.4% |
Go deeper
- BSET stock overview
- BSET income statement
- BSET valuation and score
- MBC stock overview
- MBC income statement
- MBC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.