Bassett Furniture Industries vs Hooker Furnishings
BSET and HOFT side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BSET and HOFT compare
Bassett Furniture Industries is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Hooker Furnishings ($186M against $158M).
Bassett Furniture Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.4% versus −32.8% for Hooker Furnishings).
Bassett Furniture Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.0% compared with −8.7% at Hooker Furnishings.
Both pay dividends: Bassett Furniture Industries yields 4.6% and Hooker Furnishings 3.1%.
Bassett Furniture Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 11 for Hooker Furnishings), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BSET | HOFT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $186M | $158M |
| Share price | $21.53 | $14.74 |
| Change, 1 year | 49.0% | 48.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 22.3% | −43.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.60 | 0.83 |
| Employees | 1,194 | 840 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | 1.1× | 0.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 23.0× | 8.4× (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.4% | 11.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $16.26 | $14.90 |
| Margin of safety | −32.4% | 1.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.4% (better) | −32.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.14% (better) | −12.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −12.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 56.6% (better) | 38.5% |
| Operating margin | 2.5% (better) | −6.0% |
| Net margin | 2.0% (better) | −8.7% |
| FCF margin | 2.4% | 9.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.1% (better) | −9.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 5.3% (better) | −5.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.95 | 3.03 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.72 | 3.50 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.6% (better) | 3.1% |
| Payout ratio | 102% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 11.7% (better) | 4.2% |
| Buyback yield | 0.57% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.2% (better) | 3.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 55.6% | 73.3% |
| Held by insiders | 13.6% | 9.2% |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.48% | 1.0% |
Go deeper
- BSET stock overview
- BSET income statement
- BSET valuation and score
- HOFT stock overview
- HOFT income statement
- HOFT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.