BrightSpire Capital vs HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital
BRSP and HASI side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BRSP and HASI compare
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital is the larger company, worth 12 times as much as BrightSpire Capital ($5.0B against $400M).
On earnings, BrightSpire Capital is cheaper: it trades at 24.7× trailing earnings, against 38.8× for HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital.
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (22.6% versus 2.5% for BrightSpire Capital).
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 31.5% compared with 5.6% at BrightSpire Capital.
Both pay dividends: BrightSpire Capital yields 19.9% and HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital 4.4%.
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for BrightSpire Capital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BRSP | HASI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $400M | $5.0B |
| Share price | $3.21 | $38.80 |
| Change, 1 year | −40.7% | 14.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −66.6% | −38.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.08 | 1.31 |
| Employees | 46 | 178 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 24.7× (better) | 38.8× |
| P/S | 1.2× (better) | 10.5× |
| P/B | 0.5× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.3× (better) | 9.6× |
| PEG | – | 0.88 |
| Fair value | $4.83 | $32.75 |
| Margin of safety | 33.5% (better) | −18.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.5% | 22.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.6% | 16.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −51.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −56.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 5.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 5.6% | 31.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 2.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.65 |
| Altman Z-score | −0.57 | 0.44 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 19.9% (better) | 4.4% |
| Payout ratio | 438% | 149% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 16.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | −0.99% |
| Shareholder yield | 19.9% (better) | 3.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 63.2% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 11.9% | 0.72% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$5.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.0% | 11.6% |
Go deeper
- BRSP stock overview
- BRSP income statement
- BRSP valuation and score
- HASI stock overview
- HASI income statement
- HASI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.