Brilliant Earth vs Movado
BRLT and MOV side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BRLT and MOV compare
Movado is the larger company, worth 5.7 times as much as Brilliant Earth ($709M against $125M).
Movado grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.2% versus 4.4% for Brilliant Earth).
Movado keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.0% compared with −0.93% at Brilliant Earth.
Movado pays a dividend yielding 4.7%; Brilliant Earth does not pay one.
Movado scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 6 for Brilliant Earth), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BRLT | MOV |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $125M | $709M |
| Share price | $1.23 | $31.78 |
| Change, 1 year | −43.8% | 70.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −92.9% | −18.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.64 | 0.95 |
| Employees | 785 | 1,145 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 17.7× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 1.0× |
| P/B | 10.0× | 1.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.8× |
| P/FCF | 18.4× | 9.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 5.4% | 10.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $0.759 | $37.04 |
| Margin of safety | −62.1% | 14.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.4% | 5.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.7% (better) | 5.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 139% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 137% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 57.0% (better) | 56.1% |
| Operating margin | −1.4% | 6.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.93% | 6.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.5% | 10.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | −34.4% | 8.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 12.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | – | 95.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.59 | 4.26 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.09 | 4.43 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 4.7% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 77.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 0.54% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 5.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 4.2% | 66.3% |
| Held by insiders | 35.3% | 4.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$182K | −$26.9K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.06% | – |
Go deeper
- BRLT stock overview
- BRLT income statement
- BRLT valuation and score
- MOV stock overview
- MOV income statement
- MOV valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.