Brilliant Earth vs Envela
BRLT and ELA side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BRLT and ELA compare
Envela is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as Brilliant Earth ($271M against $125M).
Envela grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (47.7% versus 4.4% for Brilliant Earth).
Envela keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.6% compared with −0.93% at Brilliant Earth.
Envela scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 6 for Brilliant Earth), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BRLT | ELA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $125M | $271M |
| Share price | $1.23 | $10.42 |
| Change, 1 year | −43.8% | −3.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −92.9% | 147% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.64 | 0.64 |
| Employees | 785 | 288 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 12.1× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 0.9× |
| P/B | 10.0× | 3.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 7.9× |
| P/FCF | 18.4× | 11.3× (better) |
| FCF yield | 5.4% | 8.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $0.759 | $14.77 |
| Margin of safety | −62.1% | 29.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.4% | 47.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.7% | 16.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 162% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 161% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 18.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 57.0% (better) | 21.7% |
| Operating margin | −1.4% | 9.6% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.93% | 7.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.5% | 8.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | −34.4% | 32.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 46.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.12 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −1.13 |
| Interest coverage | – | 79.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.59 | 4.24 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.09 | 10.62 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 4.2% | 19.3% |
| Held by insiders | 35.3% | 0.01% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$182K | $2.8K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.06% | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- BRLT stock overview
- BRLT income statement
- BRLT valuation and score
- ELA stock overview
- ELA income statement
- ELA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.