StockData

BrilliA vs Neo-Concept International

BRIA and NCI side by side, both in apparel and other finished products made from fabrics and similar materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BRIA and NCI compare

BrilliA grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−23.1% versus −41.8% for Neo-Concept International).

Neo-Concept International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.24% compared with −0.03% at BrilliA.

Neo-Concept International scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 1 for BrilliA), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBRIANCI
Size and price
Share price$1.35$5.36
Change, 1 year−25.0%−92.0%
Change, 5 years–−99.9%
Beta (5Y)0.46–
Employees224–
StockData Score
Total score16 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score00
Health score15 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−23.1% (better)−41.8%
Net income growth (TTM)−101%−95.9% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)−108%−96.1% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin14.3%36.9% (better)
Operating margin–1.3%
Net margin−0.03%0.24% (better)
FCF margin0.34%12.7% (better)
Return on equity–0.41%
Return on invested capital–1.1%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Net debt / EBITDA–−5.59
Current ratio2.234.29 (better)
Piotroski F-score36 (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions0.00%3.1%
Held by insiders72.9%74.9%
Short interest, % of float0.15%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.