StockData

Barfresh Food vs Laird Superfood

BRFH and LSF side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BRFH and LSF compare

Laird Superfood is the larger company, worth 3.8 times as much as Barfresh Food ($28.2M against $7.5M).

Laird Superfood grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (130% versus 82.1% for Barfresh Food).

Laird Superfood keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −0.08% compared with −17.9% at Barfresh Food.

Laird Superfood scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 4 for Barfresh Food), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBRFHLSF
Size and price
Market cap$7.5M$28.2M
Share price$0.460$2.52
Change, 1 year−85.0%−7.0%
Change, 5 years−90.9%−83.6%
Beta (5Y)0.531.30
Employees3226
StockData Score
Total score412 (better)
Valuation score12 (better)
Growth score22
Performance score13 (better)
Health score05 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.4×0.3× (better)
P/B–2.0×
FCF yield−55.1%−35.5% (better)
Fair value–$4.17
Margin of safety–39.5%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)82.1%130% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average40.8% (better)14.1%
Profitability
Gross margin13.0%30.9% (better)
Operating margin−18.9%−4.0% (better)
Net margin−17.9%−0.08% (better)
FCF margin−20.7%−9.1% (better)
Return on equity−364%−0.64% (better)
Return on invested capital−320%−147% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage−13.4×–
Current ratio0.714.07 (better)
Altman Z-score−6.780.87 (better)
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions24.1%17.5%
Held by insiders22.4%–
Insider net buying, 12 months−$35.3K$350K (better)
Short interest, % of float0.39%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.