BRC vs National Beverage
BRCC and FIZZ side by side, both in beverages. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BRCC and FIZZ compare
National Beverage is the larger company, worth 29 times as much as BRC ($3.4B against $118M).
BRC grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.7% versus −1.8% for National Beverage).
National Beverage keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.8% compared with −1.5% at BRC.
National Beverage pays a dividend yielding 8.8%; BRC does not pay one.
National Beverage scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 6 for BRC), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BRCC | FIZZ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $118M | $3.4B |
| Share price | $10.09 | $36.74 |
| Change, 1 year | −19.9% | 12.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −90.1% | −38.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.06 | 0.52 |
| Employees | 468 | 1,677 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 19.8× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 2.9× |
| P/B | 2.6× (better) | 9.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 13.8× |
| P/FCF | – | 21.2× |
| PEG | – | 2.23 |
| FCF yield | −0.52% | 4.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $35.56 | $42.31 |
| Margin of safety | 71.6% (better) | 13.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.7% (better) | −1.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 19.4% (better) | 1.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −5.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −6.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 1.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 34.1% | 36.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | −2.8% | 18.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −1.5% | 14.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.14% | 13.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | −14.2% | 40.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −13.5% | 64.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.68 (better) | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −2.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.59 | 2.39 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.05 | 14.10 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 8.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 174% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 8.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 2.5% | 26.3% |
| Held by insiders | 59.9% | 0.22% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.3M | $7.9K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.65% | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- BRCC stock overview
- BRCC income statement
- BRCC valuation and score
- FIZZ stock overview
- FIZZ income statement
- FIZZ valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.