Black Rock Coffee Bar vs Good Times Restaurants
BRCB and GTIM side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BRCB and GTIM compare
Black Rock Coffee Bar is the larger company, worth 38 times as much as Good Times Restaurants ($521M against $13.6M).
On earnings, Good Times Restaurants is cheaper: it trades at 6.1× trailing earnings, against 173× for Black Rock Coffee Bar.
Black Rock Coffee Bar grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.6% versus −5.8% for Good Times Restaurants).
Good Times Restaurants keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.7% compared with 0.69% at Black Rock Coffee Bar.
Good Times Restaurants scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for Black Rock Coffee Bar), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BRCB | GTIM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $521M | $13.6M |
| Share price | $10.40 | $1.29 |
| Change, 1 year | −57.9% | −17.3% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −73.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.65 | 0.65 |
| Employees | 2,800 | 2,078 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 173× | 6.1× (better) |
| P/S | 2.3× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 9.5× | 0.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 37.1× | 2.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 5.2× |
| FCF yield | −7.7% | 19.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $3.01 | $4.38 |
| Margin of safety | −246% | 70.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.6% (better) | −5.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 5.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 77.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 75.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.8% | – |
| Operating margin | 0.97% | 1.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.69% | 1.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | −17.9% | 1.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 6.5% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 5.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.56 | 0.01 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.92 (better) | −0.59 |
| Interest coverage | – | 11.5× |
| Current ratio | 0.71 (better) | 0.47 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.66 (better) | 1.58 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 31.5% | 11.5% |
| Held by insiders | 77.0% | 1.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $73.4M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 16.7% | 0.27% |
Go deeper
- BRCB stock overview
- BRCB income statement
- BRCB valuation and score
- GTIM stock overview
- GTIM income statement
- GTIM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.