BellRing Brands vs Hain Celestial
BRBR and HAIN side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BRBR and HAIN compare
BellRing Brands is the larger company, worth 96 times as much as Hain Celestial ($1.2B against $12.1M).
BellRing Brands grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.9% versus −18.7% for Hain Celestial).
BellRing Brands keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.3% compared with −23.7% at Hain Celestial.
BellRing Brands scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 4 for Hain Celestial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BRBR | HAIN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.2B | $12.1M |
| Share price | $10.01 | $0.133 |
| Change, 1 year | −64.6% | −89.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −56.7% | −99.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.63 | 0.99 |
| Employees | 530 | 1,800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.0× | – |
| P/S | 0.5× | 0.0× (better) |
| P/B | – | 0.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.8× | – |
| P/FCF | 5.2× | – |
| PEG | 0.29 | – |
| FCF yield | 19.3% | – |
| Fair value | $35.52 | $7.62 |
| Margin of safety | 71.8% | 98.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.9% (better) | −18.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.6% (better) | −7.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −24.9% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −18.9% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 22.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.6% (better) | 20.9% |
| Operating margin | 13.3% (better) | −17.0% |
| Net margin | 7.3% (better) | −23.7% |
| FCF margin | 9.6% | – |
| Return on equity | – | −100% |
| Return on invested capital | 36.4% (better) | −18.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 4.08 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.27 | – |
| Current ratio | 2.25 (better) | 0.52 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.68 (better) | −0.29 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 29.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 29.6% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 114% | 80.4% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 2.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$30.3K (better) | −$63.1K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.9% | 7.0% |
Go deeper
- BRBR stock overview
- BRBR income statement
- BRBR valuation and score
- HAIN stock overview
- HAIN income statement
- HAIN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.