Bragg Gaming vs CTW
BRAG and CTW side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BRAG and CTW compare
Bragg Gaming grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.0% versus −8.7% for CTW).
CTW scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 1 for Bragg Gaming), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BRAG | CTW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.640 | $1.44 |
| Change, 1 year | −69.1% | −41.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −90.2% | −94.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.80 | −0.70 |
| Employees | – | 137 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.0% (better) | −8.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.0% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −208% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −217% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 55.0% | 65.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | −5.0% (better) | −8.9% |
| Net margin | – | −5.0% |
| FCF margin | 16.6% (better) | −4.3% |
| Return on equity | – | −13.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −33.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −5.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.97 | 1.57 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 2 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.2% | – |
| Held by insiders | 5.8% | 96.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$1.5K |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 0.80% |
Go deeper
- BRAG stock overview
- BRAG income statement
- BRAG valuation and score
- CTW stock overview
- CTW income statement
- CTW valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.