StockData

Brookfield Property Partners L.P. vs Cushman & Wakefield

BPYPP and CWK side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BPYPP and CWK compare

Cushman & Wakefield grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.0% versus −21.6% for Brookfield Property Partners L.P.).

Cushman & Wakefield scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 0 for Brookfield Property Partners L.P.), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBPYPPCWK
Size and price
Market cap–$3.1B
Share price$14.31$13.30
Change, 1 year−6.4%−19.5%
Change, 5 years−44.6%−33.4%
Beta (5Y)0.651.54
Employees24K53K
StockData Score
Total score05 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score02 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–44.3×
P/S–0.3×
P/B–1.5×
EV/EBITDA–9.1×
P/FCF–12.5×
FCF yield–8.0%
Fair value–$9.34
Margin of safety–−42.5%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−21.6%11.0% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average1.6%5.6% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)–−66.4%
EPS growth (TTM)–−65.9%
Profitability
Gross margin–18.1%
Operating margin–4.4%
Net margin–0.64%
FCF margin−18.9%2.3% (better)
Return on equity–3.5%
Return on invested capital–8.9%
Financial health
Debt / equity–1.31
Net debt / EBITDA9.173.70 (better)
Interest coverage–2.2×
Current ratio–1.08
Altman Z-score–1.85
Piotroski F-score–5
Dividends and buybacks
Years of dividend growth0–
Dividend growth, 5Y average−2.0%–
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions–96.2%
Held by insiders–1.5%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$989K
Superinvestors holding–1
Short interest, % of float–6.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.