StockData

Boxlight vs 17 Education & Technology

BOXL and YQ side by side, both in services-educational services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BOXL and YQ compare

Boxlight grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−8.1% versus −44.0% for 17 Education & Technology).

Boxlight keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −21.0% compared with −146% at 17 Education & Technology.

17 Education & Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 1 for Boxlight), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBOXLYQ
Size and price
Market cap$1.2M–
Share price$1.86$2.70
Change, 1 year−95.3%−46.0%
Change, 5 years−99.9%−77.3%
Beta (5Y)1.160.73
Employees1551,017
StockData Score
Total score16 (better)
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score00
Health score05 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.0×–
FCF yield−401%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−8.1% (better)−44.0%
Revenue growth, 5Y average14.8% (better)−39.4%
Profitability
Gross margin33.2%47.8% (better)
Operating margin−12.9% (better)−154%
Net margin−21.0% (better)−146%
FCF margin−4.8%28.7% (better)
Return on equity–−45.4%
Return on invested capital−18.9%–
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Current ratio0.941.87 (better)
Altman Z-score−2.03–
Piotroski F-score35 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions1.0%0.01%
Held by insiders0.27%24.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$148$178K (better)
Short interest, % of float4.5%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.