StockData

Boxlight vs Jinxin Technology

BOXL and NAMI side by side, both in services-educational services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BOXL and NAMI compare

Jinxin Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.6% versus −8.1% for Boxlight).

Boxlight keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −21.0% compared with −22.8% at Jinxin Technology.

Jinxin Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 1 for Boxlight), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBOXLNAMI
Size and price
Market cap$1.2M–
Share price$1.86$1.71
Change, 1 year−95.3%−91.1%
Change, 5 years−99.9%–
Beta (5Y)1.16−0.18
Employees15510K
StockData Score
Total score13 (better)
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score00
Health score02 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.0×–
FCF yield−401%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−8.1%1.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average14.8%–
Net income growth (TTM)–−565%
EPS growth (TTM)–−275%
Profitability
Gross margin33.2% (better)11.0%
Operating margin−12.9% (better)−25.2%
Net margin−21.0% (better)−22.8%
FCF margin−4.8% (better)−6.1%
Return on equity–−95.5%
Return on invested capital−18.9% (better)−266%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.13
Interest coverage–−3257.9×
Current ratio0.941.50 (better)
Altman Z-score−2.03–
Piotroski F-score3 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions1.0%0.00%
Held by insiders0.27%59.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$148 (better)−$145K
Short interest, % of float4.5%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.