StockData

Bowhead Specialty vs Kestrel

BOW and KG side by side, both in fire, marine, and casualty insurance. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BOW and KG compare

Bowhead Specialty is the larger company, worth 43 times as much as Kestrel ($1.1B against $26.3M).

Kestrel grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.2% versus 25.0% for Bowhead Specialty).

Bowhead Specialty keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.1% compared with −156% at Kestrel.

Bowhead Specialty scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 3 for Kestrel), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBOWKG
Size and price
Market cap$1.1B$26.3M
Share price$34.13$3.36
Change, 1 year27.5%−80.0%
Change, 5 years–−94.6%
Beta (5Y)0.331.13
Employees29644
StockData Score
Total score6 (better)3
Valuation score12 (better)
Growth score3 (better)1
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score00
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E18.4×–
P/S1.8×0.8× (better)
P/B2.4×0.3× (better)
EV/EBITDA11.1×–
P/FCF3.4×–
PEG0.37–
FCF yield29.2%–
Fair value$26.38–
Margin of safety−29.4%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)25.0%26.2% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)25.7% (better)−177%
EPS growth (TTM)26.7%–
Profitability
Net margin10.1% (better)−156%
FCF margin53.5%–
Return on equity14.1% (better)−41.1%
Financial health
Altman Z-score0.61 (better)0.01
Piotroski F-score44
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions92.7%13.2%
Held by insiders76.6%56.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$13.3K
Short interest, % of float19.6%1.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.