Boot Barn vs Designer Brands
BOOT and DBI side by side, both in apparel and accessory stores. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BOOT and DBI compare
Boot Barn is the larger company, worth 12 times as much as Designer Brands ($4.0B against $345M).
On earnings, Boot Barn is cheaper: it trades at 16.7× trailing earnings, against 27.0× for Designer Brands.
Boot Barn grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.6% versus −0.84% for Designer Brands).
Boot Barn keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.4% compared with 0.59% at Designer Brands.
Designer Brands pays a dividend yielding 3.0%; Boot Barn does not pay one.
Boot Barn scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 10 for Designer Brands), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BOOT | DBI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.0B | $345M |
| Share price | $132.24 | $6.74 |
| Change, 1 year | −31.9% | 83.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 12.1% | −54.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.62 | 1.40 |
| Employees | 8,900 | 13K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.7× (better) | 27.0× |
| P/S | 1.7× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 2.9× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.1× | 1.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 34.3× | 2.9× (better) |
| PEG | 1.79 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.9% | 34.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $130.23 | $10.76 |
| Margin of safety | −1.5% | 37.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.6% (better) | −0.84% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 20.3% (better) | 5.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 24.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 24.4% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 29.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.5% | 45.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 13.6% (better) | 3.5% |
| Net margin | 10.4% (better) | 0.59% |
| FCF margin | 5.0% (better) | 4.1% |
| Return on equity | 19.2% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 21.0% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.28 |
| Current ratio | 2.53 (better) | 1.22 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.27 (better) | 1.86 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 3.0% |
| Payout ratio | – | 57.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 14.9% |
| Buyback yield | 1.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.6% | 3.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 115% | 70.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.68% | 48.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.7M (better) | −$1.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.7% | 21.2% |
Go deeper
- BOOT stock overview
- BOOT income statement
- BOOT valuation and score
- DBI stock overview
- DBI income statement
- DBI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.