DMC Global vs Worthington Enterprises
BOOM and WOR side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BOOM and WOR compare
Worthington Enterprises is the larger company, worth 18 times as much as DMC Global ($2.9B against $161M).
Worthington Enterprises grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.4% versus −1.6% for DMC Global).
Worthington Enterprises keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.5% compared with −1.2% at DMC Global.
Worthington Enterprises pays a dividend yielding 1.3%; DMC Global does not pay one.
Worthington Enterprises scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 8 for DMC Global), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BOOM | WOR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $161M | $2.9B |
| Share price | $7.83 | $58.20 |
| Change, 1 year | 24.5% | 5.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −79.4% | 7.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.37 | 1.09 |
| Employees | 1,500 | 3,800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 17.6× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 2.0× |
| P/B | 0.6× (better) | 2.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.7× (better) | 22.3× |
| P/FCF | 12.9× (better) | 14.6× |
| FCF yield | 7.7% (better) | 6.8% |
| Fair value | $14.45 | $49.01 |
| Margin of safety | 45.8% (better) | −18.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.6% | 18.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 21.6% (better) | −15.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 52.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 55.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −25.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.5% | 27.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 0.74% | 5.6% (better) |
| Net margin | −1.2% | 11.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.0% | 13.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | −2.8% | 16.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.3% | 5.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.21 (better) | 0.29 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.37 (better) | 1.79 |
| Interest coverage | 0.8× | 9.7× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.56 | 2.67 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.72 | 3.30 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 23.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −5.9% |
| Buyback yield | 0.65% | 1.9% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.65% | 3.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 69.2% | 52.1% |
| Held by insiders | 16.4% | 37.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$111K (better) | −$10.0M |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.1% | 2.6% |
Go deeper
- BOOM stock overview
- BOOM income statement
- BOOM valuation and score
- WOR stock overview
- WOR income statement
- WOR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.