DMC Global vs Quanex Building Products
BOOM and NX side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BOOM and NX compare
Quanex Building Products is the larger company, worth 5.5 times as much as DMC Global ($879M against $161M).
Quanex Building Products grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.3% versus −1.6% for DMC Global).
Quanex Building Products keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.4% compared with −1.2% at DMC Global.
Quanex Building Products pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; DMC Global does not pay one.
Quanex Building Products scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 8 for DMC Global), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BOOM | NX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $161M | $879M |
| Share price | $7.83 | $19.19 |
| Change, 1 year | 24.5% | 45.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −79.4% | −16.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.37 | 1.09 |
| Employees | 1,500 | 7,071 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 19.4× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 0.5× |
| P/B | 0.6× (better) | 1.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.7× (better) | 7.1× |
| P/FCF | 12.9× | 9.7× (better) |
| FCF yield | 7.7% | 10.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $14.45 | $21.55 |
| Margin of safety | 45.8% (better) | 11.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.6% | 1.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 21.6% (better) | 16.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.5% | 26.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 0.74% | 6.0% (better) |
| Net margin | −1.2% | 2.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.0% | 4.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | −2.8% | 6.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.3% | 6.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.21 (better) | 0.89 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.37 (better) | 2.87 |
| Interest coverage | 0.8× | 2.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.56 (better) | 2.23 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.72 | 1.89 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 32.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | 0.65% (better) | 0.55% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.65% | 2.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 69.2% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 16.4% | 10.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$111K (better) | −$3.4M |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.1% | 7.1% |
Go deeper
- BOOM stock overview
- BOOM income statement
- BOOM valuation and score
- NX stock overview
- NX income statement
- NX valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.