DMC Global vs NWPX Infrastructure
BOOM and NWPX side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BOOM and NWPX compare
NWPX Infrastructure is the larger company, worth 5.4 times as much as DMC Global ($867M against $161M).
NWPX Infrastructure grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.9% versus −1.6% for DMC Global).
NWPX Infrastructure keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.9% compared with −1.2% at DMC Global.
NWPX Infrastructure scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 8 for DMC Global), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BOOM | NWPX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $161M | $867M |
| Share price | $7.83 | $90.02 |
| Change, 1 year | 24.5% | 54.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −79.4% | 202% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.37 | 0.94 |
| Employees | 1,500 | 1,318 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 16.5× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 1.4× |
| P/B | 0.6× (better) | 2.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.7× (better) | 12.2× |
| P/FCF | 12.9× | 10.0× (better) |
| PEG | – | 3.58 |
| FCF yield | 7.7% | 10.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $14.45 | $77.63 |
| Margin of safety | 45.8% (better) | −16.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.6% | 15.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 21.6% (better) | 13.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 46.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 48.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 13.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.5% (better) | 20.9% |
| Operating margin | 0.74% | 11.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −1.2% | 8.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.0% | 14.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | −2.8% | 13.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.3% | 13.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.21 | 0.02 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.37 | 0.04 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 0.8× | 48.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.56 | 2.56 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.72 | 4.22 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 9 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.65% | 0.76% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.65% | 0.76% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 69.2% | 90.0% |
| Held by insiders | 16.4% | 3.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$111K (better) | −$9.4M |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.1% | 8.0% |
Go deeper
- BOOM stock overview
- BOOM income statement
- BOOM valuation and score
- NWPX stock overview
- NWPX income statement
- NWPX valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.