Boston Omaha vs New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership
BOC and NEN side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BOC and NEN compare
Boston Omaha is the larger company, worth 79 times as much as New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership ($414M against $5.3M).
New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.1% versus 3.7% for Boston Omaha).
New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −7.6% compared with −12.1% at Boston Omaha.
New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership pays a dividend yielding 3.5%; Boston Omaha does not pay one.
Boston Omaha scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BOC | NEN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $414M | $5.3M |
| Share price | $13.74 | $46.00 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.5% | −34.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −54.7% | −24.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.69 | 0.08 |
| Employees | 422 | 16 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 3.8× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 0.8× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | – | −0.4× |
| FCF yield | −1.4% | – |
| Fair value | $16.25 | $3514.80 |
| Margin of safety | 15.4% | 98.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.7% | 12.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 20.1% (better) | 7.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −1830% | −163% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −1500% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 65.7% | – |
| Operating margin | −4.7% | 14.0% (better) |
| Net margin | −12.1% | −7.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | −5.2% | – |
| Return on equity | −2.6% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −0.78% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.09 | – |
| Interest coverage | −2.1× | 0.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.05 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.68 (better) | 0.30 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 3.5% |
| Buyback yield | 3.9% | 35.0% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.9% | 38.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 66.3% | 82.3% |
| Held by insiders | 46.2% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.2M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.7% | – |
Go deeper
- BOC stock overview
- BOC income statement
- BOC valuation and score
- NEN stock overview
- NEN income statement
- NEN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.