StockData

BioNTech vs Neurocrine Biosciences

BNTX and NBIX side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BNTX and NBIX compare

Neurocrine Biosciences grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (34.4% versus 4.3% for BioNTech).

Neurocrine Biosciences keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.9% compared with −39.6% at BioNTech.

Neurocrine Biosciences scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 3 for BioNTech), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBNTXNBIX
Size and price
Market cap–$14.9B
Share price$88.17$146.10
Change, 1 year−14.7%5.9%
Change, 5 years−59.3%56.7%
Beta (5Y)0.820.49
Employees5001,800
StockData Score
Total score319 (better)
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score15 (better)
Performance score15 (better)
Health score16 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–21.4×
P/S–4.4×
P/B–4.0×
EV/EBITDA–18.2×
P/FCF–17.1×
PEG–0.49
FCF yield–5.9%
Fair value–$177.51
Margin of safety–17.7%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)4.3%34.4% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average42.9% (better)22.3%
Net income growth (TTM)–103%
EPS growth (TTM)–102%
EPS growth, 5Y average–2.3%
Profitability
Gross margin77.6%98.0% (better)
Operating margin−49.0%23.6% (better)
Net margin−39.6%20.9% (better)
FCF margin9.8%25.8% (better)
Return on equity–22.1%
Return on invested capital–23.7%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage−20.1×–
Current ratio7.54 (better)1.87
Altman Z-score–6.83
Piotroski F-score57 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−0.84%
Shareholder yield–−0.84%
Ownership
Held by institutions18.9%99.5%
Held by insiders58.1%1.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$69.2M (better)−$77.9M
Short interest, % of float–5.8%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.