StockData

Burning Rock Biotech vs CareDx

BNR and CDNA side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BNR and CDNA compare

CareDx grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (38.9% versus 4.6% for Burning Rock Biotech).

CareDx keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 25.9% compared with −10.3% at Burning Rock Biotech.

CareDx scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 4 for Burning Rock Biotech), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBNRCDNA
Size and price
Market cap–$4.3B
Share price$13.24$81.17
Change, 1 year8.6%386%
Change, 5 years−92.3%88.7%
Beta (5Y)1.741.52
Employees667765
StockData Score
Total score412 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score14 (better)
Health score26 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–34.0×
P/S–8.6×
P/B–9.1×
EV/EBITDA–29.9×
Fair value–$66.02
Margin of safety–−22.9%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)4.6%38.9% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average4.6%14.6% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)–82.6%
Profitability
Gross margin74.7%–
Operating margin−10.2%23.4% (better)
Net margin−10.3%25.9% (better)
FCF margin−6.2%–
Return on equity−9.9%33.0% (better)
Return on invested capital−72.5%69.8% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00 (better)0.00
Current ratio2.99 (better)2.31
Altman Z-score–15.36
Piotroski F-score55
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions1.8%102%
Held by insiders19.0%4.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months$11.6M (better)−$18.1M
Short interest, % of float–14.4%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.