Broadstone Net Lease vs STAG Industrial
BNL and STAG side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BNL and STAG compare
STAG Industrial is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as Broadstone Net Lease ($7.1B against $3.3B).
On earnings, Broadstone Net Lease is cheaper: it trades at 22.5× trailing earnings, against 28.4× for STAG Industrial.
STAG Industrial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.6% versus 7.7% for Broadstone Net Lease).
Broadstone Net Lease keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 30.6% compared with 28.1% at STAG Industrial.
Both pay dividends: Broadstone Net Lease yields 6.8% and STAG Industrial 4.2%.
Broadstone Net Lease scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 8 for STAG Industrial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BNL | STAG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.3B | $7.1B |
| Share price | $17.10 | $36.86 |
| Change, 1 year | −4.6% | −2.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −35.7% | −13.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.58 | 0.74 |
| Employees | 62 | 93 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.5× (better) | 28.4× |
| P/S | 6.9× (better) | 8.1× |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 2.0× |
| P/FCF | 12.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 7.8% | – |
| Fair value | $18.03 | $33.40 |
| Margin of safety | 5.2% (better) | −10.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.7% | 9.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.1% | 11.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 47.4% (better) | 5.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 49.0% (better) | 2.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 2.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 30.6% (better) | 28.1% |
| FCF margin | 54.0% | – |
| Return on equity | 5.0% | 7.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 0.77 | 1.05 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.8% (better) | 4.2% |
| Payout ratio | 150% | 98.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.68% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.8% (better) | 4.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.1% | 93.8% |
| Held by insiders | 1.2% | 0.21% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $212K (better) | −$5.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.2% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- BNL stock overview
- BNL income statement
- BNL valuation and score
- STAG stock overview
- STAG income statement
- STAG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.