Broadstone Net Lease vs Essential Properties Realty Trust
BNL and EPRT side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BNL and EPRT compare
Essential Properties Realty Trust is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Broadstone Net Lease ($5.8B against $3.3B).
On earnings, Essential Properties Realty Trust is cheaper: it trades at 20.7× trailing earnings, against 22.5× for Broadstone Net Lease.
Essential Properties Realty Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (22.3% versus 7.7% for Broadstone Net Lease).
Essential Properties Realty Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 43.5% compared with 30.6% at Broadstone Net Lease.
Both pay dividends: Broadstone Net Lease yields 6.8% and Essential Properties Realty Trust 4.7%.
Broadstone Net Lease scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 12 for Essential Properties Realty Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BNL | EPRT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.3B | $5.8B |
| Share price | $17.10 | $26.75 |
| Change, 1 year | −4.6% | −11.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −35.7% | −11.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.58 | 0.63 |
| Employees | 62 | 56 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 4 | 4 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.5× | 20.7× (better) |
| P/S | 6.9× (better) | 9.4× |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 1.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 10.4× |
| P/FCF | 12.8× | – |
| PEG | – | 2.32 |
| FCF yield | 7.8% | – |
| Fair value | $18.03 | $29.06 |
| Margin of safety | 5.2% | 7.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.7% | 22.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.1% | 27.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 47.4% (better) | 19.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 49.0% (better) | 9.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 2.6% | 23.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 62.8% |
| Net margin | 30.6% | 43.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 54.0% | – |
| Return on equity | 5.0% | 6.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 9.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 3.2× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.77 | 1.37 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.8% (better) | 4.7% |
| Payout ratio | 150% | 94.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | – |
| Buyback yield | – | −9.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.8% (better) | −4.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.1% | 117% |
| Held by insiders | 1.2% | 0.56% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $212K (better) | −$1.5M |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.2% | 6.5% |
Go deeper
- BNL stock overview
- BNL income statement
- BNL valuation and score
- EPRT stock overview
- EPRT income statement
- EPRT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.