Broadstone Net Lease vs CBL & Associates Properties
BNL and CBL side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BNL and CBL compare
Broadstone Net Lease is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as CBL & Associates Properties ($3.3B against $1.6B).
On earnings, CBL & Associates Properties is cheaper: it trades at 7.3× trailing earnings, against 22.5× for Broadstone Net Lease.
CBL & Associates Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.0% versus 7.7% for Broadstone Net Lease).
CBL & Associates Properties keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 37.0% compared with 30.6% at Broadstone Net Lease.
Both pay dividends: Broadstone Net Lease yields 6.8% and CBL & Associates Properties 4.3%.
Broadstone Net Lease scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 11 for CBL & Associates Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BNL | CBL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.3B | $1.6B |
| Share price | $17.10 | $50.41 |
| Change, 1 year | −4.6% | 71.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −35.7% | 55.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.58 | 0.79 |
| Employees | 62 | 500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.5× | 7.3× (better) |
| P/S | 6.9× | 2.7× (better) |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 3.6× |
| P/FCF | 12.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 7.8% | – |
| Fair value | $18.03 | $146.53 |
| Margin of safety | 5.2% | 65.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.7% | 9.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.1% (better) | 0.09% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 47.4% | 231% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 49.0% | 227% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 2.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 30.6% | 37.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 54.0% | – |
| Return on equity | 5.0% | 60.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 4.59 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.77 (better) | 0.51 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.8% (better) | 4.3% |
| Payout ratio | 150% | 30.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.8% (better) | 5.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.1% | 79.6% |
| Held by insiders | 1.2% | 15.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $212K (better) | −$54.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.2% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- BNL stock overview
- BNL income statement
- BNL valuation and score
- CBL stock overview
- CBL income statement
- CBL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.