Brookfield vs ReNew Energy Global
BN and RNW side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BN and RNW compare
ReNew Energy Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (36.2% versus −12.7% for Brookfield).
ReNew Energy Global keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.4% compared with 1.7% at Brookfield.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BN | RNW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $39.28 | $6.85 |
| Change, 1 year | −15.6% | −10.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −4.3% | −32.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.46 | 0.72 |
| Employees | – | 4,720 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −12.7% | 36.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.7% | 19.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 104% | 158% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 145% | 152% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 62.2% | – |
| Operating margin | – | 10.6% |
| Net margin | 1.7% | 7.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | −5.1% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 8.3% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 1.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 6.10 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 18.29 |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.2× |
| Current ratio | – | 0.43 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | 42.2% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.8% | 40.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 82.5% |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 | – |
Go deeper
- BN stock overview
- BN income statement
- BN valuation and score
- RNW stock overview
- RNW income statement
- RNW valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.