BitMine Immersion Technologies vs TeraWulf
BMNR and WULF side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BMNR and WULF compare
BitMine Immersion Technologies is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as TeraWulf ($11.6B against $6.7B).
BitMine Immersion Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1948% versus 13.9% for TeraWulf).
BitMine Immersion Technologies pays a dividend yielding 0.05%; TeraWulf does not pay one.
BitMine Immersion Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 2 for TeraWulf), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BMNR | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.6B | $6.7B |
| Share price | $19.24 | $13.36 |
| Change, 1 year | −53.2% | −6.6% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −68.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | – | 2.32 |
| Employees | 26 | 141 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 93.0× | 34.9× (better) |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 7.7× |
| FCF yield | – | −46.7% |
| Fair value | – | $4.05 |
| Margin of safety | – | −230% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1948% (better) | 13.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 65.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 85.3% (better) | 25.7% |
| Operating margin | −5207% | −250% (better) |
| Net margin | – | −411% |
| FCF margin | – | −1631% |
| Return on equity | – | −140% |
| Return on invested capital | −45.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −2.0× |
| Current ratio | 27.27 (better) | 0.97 |
| Altman Z-score | 204.53 (better) | 0.08 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 1 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.05% (better) | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Buyback yield | −114% | −18.0% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −114% | −18.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 41.1% | 79.6% |
| Held by insiders | 2.0% | 20.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $15.4K (better) | −$35.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 30.9% |
Go deeper
- BMNR stock overview
- BMNR income statement
- BMNR valuation and score
- WULF stock overview
- WULF income statement
- WULF valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.