StockData

Blink Charging vs Wallbox

BLNK and WBX side by side, both in electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BLNK and WBX compare

Wallbox grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−11.5% versus −15.9% for Blink Charging).

Blink Charging scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 0 for Wallbox), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBLNKWBX
Size and price
Market cap$60.9M–
Share price$0.420$2.12
Change, 1 year−73.4%−39.8%
Change, 5 years−99.0%−99.3%
Beta (5Y)1.77–
Employees320637
StockData Score
Total score11 (better)0
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score5 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.7×–
P/B1.4×–
FCF yield−21.9%–
Fair value$0.640–
Margin of safety34.4%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−15.9%−11.5% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average75.4% (better)49.1%
Profitability
Gross margin27.5%–
Operating margin−65.6% (better)−68.4%
Net margin−64.9%–
FCF margin−15.2%6.5% (better)
Return on equity−84.4%–
Return on invested capital−112%−52.1% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage–−5.5×
Current ratio1.18–
Altman Z-score−11.81–
Piotroski F-score4–
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions12.0%1.3%
Held by insiders3.0%–
Insider net buying, 12 months$75.3K$5.0M (better)
Short interest, % of float10.7%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.