StockData

BillionToOne vs Grail

BLLN and GRAL side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BLLN and GRAL compare

BillionToOne and Grail are about the same size, with market caps of $5.0B and $5.2B.

BillionToOne grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (71.9% versus 17.5% for Grail).

BillionToOne keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.3% compared with −244% at Grail.

BillionToOne scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Grail), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBLLNGRAL
Size and price
Market cap$5.0B$5.2B
Share price$105.15$115.89
Change, 1 year3.3%36.7%
Beta (5Y)−0.042.49
Employees713910
StockData Score
Total score11 (better)10
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score3 (better)2
Performance score2 (better)1
Health score66
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S11.4× (better)31.1×
P/B8.8×2.1× (better)
EV/EBITDA84.8×–
P/FCF146×–
FCF yield0.68% (better)−6.0%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)71.9% (better)17.5%
Profitability
Gross margin71.4%–
Operating margin10.2% (better)−347%
Net margin11.3% (better)−244%
FCF margin7.8% (better)−187%
Return on equity30.2% (better)−17.3%
Return on invested capital–−27.1%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Interest coverage1655×–
Current ratio11.25 (better)8.93
Altman Z-score16.67 (better)5.51
Piotroski F-score8 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions32.4%87.6%
Held by insiders55.7%11.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$58.5M−$38.0M (better)
Short interest, % of float14.2%20.1%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.