StockData

BillionToOne vs Castle Biosciences

BLLN and CSTL side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BLLN and CSTL compare

BillionToOne is the larger company, worth 4.8 times as much as Castle Biosciences ($5.0B against $1.0B).

BillionToOne grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (71.9% versus 9.8% for Castle Biosciences).

BillionToOne keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.3% compared with −6.1% at Castle Biosciences.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBLLNCSTL
Size and price
Market cap$5.0B$1.0B
Share price$105.15$33.79
Change, 1 year3.3%−3.0%
Change, 5 years–−28.9%
Beta (5Y)−0.041.38
Employees713883
StockData Score
Total score1111
Valuation score02 (better)
Growth score3 (better)2
Performance score23 (better)
Health score6 (better)4
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S11.4×2.7× (better)
P/B8.8×2.2× (better)
EV/EBITDA84.8×–
P/FCF146× (better)260×
FCF yield0.68% (better)0.38%
Fair value–$34.71
Margin of safety–2.6%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)71.9% (better)9.8%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–40.6%
Profitability
Gross margin71.4%77.1% (better)
Operating margin10.2% (better)−7.4%
Net margin11.3% (better)−6.1%
FCF margin7.8% (better)1.1%
Return on equity30.2% (better)−4.9%
Return on invested capital–−11.1%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.02 (better)
Interest coverage1655× (better)−51.2×
Current ratio11.25 (better)5.28
Altman Z-score16.67 (better)6.63
Piotroski F-score8 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield–0.00%
Years of dividend growth–0
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions32.4%89.5%
Held by insiders55.7%1.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$58.5M−$18.3M (better)
Short interest, % of float14.2%7.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.