Bridgeline Digital vs Parabolic Technologies
BLIN and PARA side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BLIN and PARA compare
Bridgeline Digital is the larger company, worth 20 times as much as Parabolic Technologies ($7.5M against $369K).
Parabolic Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.6% versus 1.6% for Bridgeline Digital).
Bridgeline Digital keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −8.6% compared with −229% at Parabolic Technologies.
Parabolic Technologies pays a dividend yielding 962%; Bridgeline Digital does not pay one.
Parabolic Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 5 for Bridgeline Digital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BLIN | PARA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.5M | $369K |
| Share price | $0.598 | $0.104 |
| Change, 1 year | −48.0% | −100.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −79.3% | −100% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.73 | −1.04 |
| Employees | 40 | 33 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.5× | 0.0× (better) |
| P/B | 0.8× | 0.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | −4.2% | – |
| Fair value | $1.82 | $11.92 |
| Margin of safety | 67.2% | 99.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.6% | 19.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 65.2% | 81.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | −9.9% (better) | −178% |
| Net margin | −8.6% (better) | −229% |
| FCF margin | −2.0% | – |
| Return on equity | −14.3% (better) | −319% |
| Return on invested capital | −15.8% (better) | −242% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.02 (better) | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 0.61 (better) | 0.10 |
| Altman Z-score | −7.46 | −7.37 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 962% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 962% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 12.8% | 98.8% |
| Held by insiders | 26.5% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $69.7K (better) | −$602K |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.16% | – |
Go deeper
- BLIN stock overview
- BLIN income statement
- BLIN valuation and score
- PARA stock overview
- PARA income statement
- PARA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.