Builders FirstSource vs Floor & Decor
BLDR and FND side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BLDR and FND compare
Builders FirstSource is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Floor & Decor ($7.0B against $5.1B).
On earnings, Floor & Decor is cheaper: it trades at 22.1× trailing earnings, against 175× for Builders FirstSource.
Floor & Decor grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.4% versus −8.3% for Builders FirstSource).
Floor & Decor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.9% compared with 0.28% at Builders FirstSource.
Floor & Decor scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 5 for Builders FirstSource), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BLDR | FND |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.0B | $5.1B |
| Share price | $64.91 | $47.59 |
| Change, 1 year | −43.7% | −31.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −3.5% | −64.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.34 | 1.53 |
| Employees | 28K | 14K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 175× | 22.1× (better) |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 1.1× |
| P/B | 1.7× (better) | 2.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.8× | 9.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 27.8× | 24.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.6% | 4.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $70.78 | $64.99 |
| Margin of safety | 8.3% | 26.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.3% | 2.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.2% | 14.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −93.2% | 9.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −93.0% | 10.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.9% (better) | 0.85% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.5% | 44.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 2.1% | 6.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.28% | 4.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.7% | 4.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 0.97% | 9.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 3.6% | 9.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.13 | 0.08 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.05 (better) | −0.23 |
| Current ratio | 1.85 (better) | 1.33 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.10 | 2.50 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 4.3% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.3% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100% | 119% |
| Held by insiders | 16.5% | 1.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $4.0M (better) | −$13.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.2% | 13.2% |
Go deeper
- BLDR stock overview
- BLDR income statement
- BLDR valuation and score
- FND stock overview
- FND income statement
- FND valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.