BK Technologies vs Unusual Machines
BKTI and UMAC side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BKTI and UMAC compare
Unusual Machines is the larger company, worth 2.4 times as much as BK Technologies ($564M against $232M).
Unusual Machines grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (425% versus 10.8% for BK Technologies).
BK Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.2% compared with −75.9% at Unusual Machines.
BK Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 10 for Unusual Machines), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BKTI | UMAC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $232M | $564M |
| Share price | $61.48 | $11.28 |
| Change, 1 year | −17.6% | 5.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 435% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.60 | 3.33 |
| Employees | 120 | 18 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.8× | – |
| P/S | 2.5× (better) | 12.9× |
| P/B | 4.1× | 1.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.0× | – |
| P/FCF | 19.7× | – |
| FCF yield | 5.1% (better) | −16.0% |
| Fair value | $78.48 | $14.72 |
| Margin of safety | 21.7% | 23.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.8% | 425% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.3% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 7.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 4.8% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 103% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 51.2% (better) | 34.7% |
| Operating margin | 17.2% (better) | −76.1% |
| Net margin | 15.2% (better) | −75.9% |
| FCF margin | 12.8% (better) | −207% |
| Return on equity | 28.6% (better) | −14.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 57.0% (better) | −22.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | – | −51138.4× |
| Current ratio | 4.03 | 34.64 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 8.45 | 26.56 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.31% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.31% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 59.7% | 59.8% |
| Held by insiders | 11.4% | 23.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$248K (better) | −$10.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.7% | 28.8% |
Go deeper
- BKTI stock overview
- BKTI income statement
- BKTI valuation and score
- UMAC stock overview
- UMAC income statement
- UMAC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.