Baker Hughes vs SLB
BKR and SLB side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BKR and SLB compare
SLB is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Baker Hughes ($79.8B against $54.8B).
SLB grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.5% versus 0.42% for Baker Hughes).
Baker Hughes keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.2% compared with 8.5% at SLB.
Both pay dividends: Baker Hughes yields 1.7% and SLB 2.2%.
SLB scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Baker Hughes), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BKR | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $54.8B | $79.8B |
| Share price | $55.23 | $53.74 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.3% | 45.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 123% | 60.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.65 | 0.73 |
| Employees | 56K | 109K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 26.0× |
| P/S | 2.0× (better) | 2.2× |
| P/B | 2.8× (better) | 3.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 12.2× |
| P/FCF | 17.5× | 16.6× (better) |
| FCF yield | 5.7% | 6.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $27.85 | $39.80 |
| Margin of safety | −98.3% | −35.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.42% | 2.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.0% | 8.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 1.6% (better) | −24.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −29.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 11.2% (better) | 8.5% |
| FCF margin | 11.3% | 13.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 16.5% (better) | 13.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.82 | 0.43 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.98 |
| Current ratio | 2.09 (better) | 1.44 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.86 | 2.95 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.7% | 2.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 29.4% | 54.7% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 1.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.7% | 3.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.2% | 92.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.13% | 0.19% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$73.2M | −$25.6M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.4% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- BKR stock overview
- BKR income statement
- BKR valuation and score
- SLB stock overview
- SLB income statement
- SLB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.