Baker Hughes vs DNOW
BKR and DNOW side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BKR and DNOW compare
Baker Hughes is the larger company, worth 19 times as much as DNOW ($54.8B against $2.9B).
DNOW grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (69.8% versus 0.42% for Baker Hughes).
Baker Hughes keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.2% compared with −4.9% at DNOW.
Baker Hughes pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; DNOW does not pay one.
Baker Hughes scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for DNOW), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BKR | DNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $54.8B | $2.9B |
| Share price | $55.23 | $16.31 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.3% | 10.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 123% | 71.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.65 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 56K | 5,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 2.0× | 0.7× (better) |
| P/B | 2.8× | 1.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 17.5× (better) | 21.7× |
| FCF yield | 5.7% (better) | 4.6% |
| Fair value | $27.85 | $15.04 |
| Margin of safety | −98.3% | −8.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.42% | 69.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.0% | 11.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 1.6% (better) | −396% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 15.5% |
| Operating margin | – | −5.0% |
| Net margin | 11.2% (better) | −4.9% |
| FCF margin | 11.3% (better) | 3.3% |
| Return on equity | 16.5% (better) | −12.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −11.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.82 (better) | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 2.09 | 2.14 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.86 | 1.95 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.7% | – |
| Payout ratio | 29.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 2.9% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.7% | 2.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.2% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 0.13% | 1.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$73.2M | −$7.5M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.4% | 4.3% |
Go deeper
- BKR stock overview
- BKR income statement
- BKR valuation and score
- DNOW stock overview
- DNOW income statement
- DNOW valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.