Booking vs GXO Logistics
BKNG and GXO side by side, both in transportation services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BKNG and GXO compare
Booking is the larger company, worth 19 times as much as GXO Logistics ($111B against $5.8B).
On earnings, Booking is cheaper: it trades at 16.4× trailing earnings, against 44.5× for GXO Logistics.
Booking grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.9% versus 7.6% for GXO Logistics).
Booking pays a dividend yielding 1.1%; GXO Logistics does not pay one.
Booking scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 5 for GXO Logistics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BKNG | GXO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $111B | $5.8B |
| Share price | $148.13 | $50.27 |
| Change, 1 year | −27.0% | −6.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 41.4% | −46.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.19 | 1.42 |
| Employees | 24K | 154K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.4× (better) | 44.5× |
| P/S | 3.9× | 0.4× (better) |
| P/B | – | 1.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.6× | 10.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 11.7× (better) | 32.0× |
| PEG | 0.56 | – |
| FCF yield | 8.6% (better) | 3.1% |
| Fair value | $202.08 | $48.39 |
| Margin of safety | 26.7% (better) | −3.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.9% (better) | 7.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 31.7% (better) | 16.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 108% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 57.1% | 113% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 158% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 32.9% (better) | 2.4% |
| Net margin | – | 0.96% |
| FCF margin | 33.8% (better) | 1.3% |
| Return on equity | – | 4.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 3.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.07 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.30 (better) | 3.05 |
| Interest coverage | 8.4× (better) | 2.5× |
| Current ratio | 1.09 (better) | 0.79 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.74 (better) | 1.56 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Buyback yield | 9.5% (better) | 0.31% |
| Shareholder yield | 10.6% (better) | 0.31% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.9% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 0.20% | 2.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$55.6M | $304K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.0% | 6.6% |
Go deeper
- BKNG stock overview
- BKNG income statement
- BKNG valuation and score
- GXO stock overview
- GXO income statement
- GXO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.