Birkenstock vs Steven Madden
BIRK and SHOO side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BIRK and SHOO compare
Steven Madden grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.2% versus 11.8% for Birkenstock).
Steven Madden pays a dividend yielding 1.9%; Birkenstock does not pay one.
Steven Madden scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 8 for Birkenstock), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BIRK | SHOO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $3.2B |
| Share price | $33.43 | $43.50 |
| Change, 1 year | −16.7% | 26.4% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −12.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.18 | 1.16 |
| Employees | 8,400 | 6,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 1.2× |
| P/B | – | 3.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 13.7× |
| P/FCF | – | 14.2× |
| FCF yield | – | 7.0% |
| Fair value | – | $31.98 |
| Margin of safety | – | −36.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.8% | 18.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 16.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 9.4% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 11.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 56.9% (better) | 46.1% |
| Operating margin | 24.2% (better) | 7.5% |
| Net margin | 14.8% | – |
| FCF margin | 12.9% (better) | 8.2% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 15.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.13 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.47 | 0.51 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 5.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.78 (better) | 1.91 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 5.76 |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 41.1% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.43% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 2.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.0% | 100% |
| Held by insiders | 64.1% | 2.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.1B | −$4.0M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 6.3% |
Go deeper
- BIRK stock overview
- BIRK income statement
- BIRK valuation and score
- SHOO stock overview
- SHOO income statement
- SHOO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.